San Jose is exploring changes to how city employees accused of misconduct are investigated.
The Rules and Open Government Committee on Wednesday approved Mayor Sam Liccardo’s memo asking the city manager and the independent police auditor (IPA) to break down what checks are in place to hold employees accountable and suggest new ones to protect the public.
The proposal follows the recent arrest and conviction of two city employees: San Jose Police Department Officer Matthew Dominguez and former Code Enforcement Inspector William Gerry. Dominguez was arrested for exposing himself to a family in their home in April —but was accused of sexual battery of a 25-year-old woman nearly a year before. Gerry was sentenced to 35 years in prison for soliciting bribes and extorting sex from massage parlor owners, in addition to molesting two children. His crimes allegedly started in 2018, but continued even after they were first reported.
“Some of these things are completely criminal in nature and unacceptable,” Councimember Raul Peralez said. “We need to have a process hopefully that ensures that we don’t have city employees that are committing these types of acts.”
May 12, 2022
San Jose citizen committee proposes police reforms
March 7, 2022
Why San Jose can’t fully audit its own police
February 24, 2022
Reports recommend reforms for San Jose police
June 26, 2021
Report: 1 in 4 San Jose police officers received a complaint
In his memo, Liccardo said the employees continued working in public-facing roles for several months, subjecting additional residents to harm and risk.
The mayor specifically calls on the IPA to review cases of misconduct and recommend changes to SJPD’s duty manual. However, this request may not go far because while the IPA has authority to investigate some cases and make recommendations, it has no real power to enforce decisions or unfettered access to SJPD data to conduct a thorough review. An IPA report revealed last year that a quarter of San Jose officers had complaints filed against them in 2020.
City Attorney Nora Frimann said her office is working with the city’s IPA, Shivaun Nurre, to determine how she can conduct the study—the scope of the mayor’s direction may exceed the authority of the IPA.
“What would’ve been better is a policy to change and enhance the authority of the IPA so they could conduct those kinds of investigations,” said Aaron Zisser, the city’s former IPA and a thecupertinodigest.com columnist.
Zisser said there needs to be an oversight body to review all of SJPD’s processes and not only suggest, but enforce recommendations similar to those put forth by the city’s Charter Review Commission and Reimagining Public Safety Community Advisory Committee.
“There isn’t an oversight agency that’s tasked with comprehensive review and that is what we need,” Zisser said. “It could look at background checks, the hiring process to see if (the city) missed anything.”
Raj Jayadev, criminal justice advocate and founder of Silicon Valley De-Bug, agreed with Zisser, but emphasized the need for significant change in the police’s culture of accountability.
“Auditing and holding someone to account are not synonymous,” Jayadev told thecupertinodigest.com. “There’s only so many times you do an annual report that confirms the same trends and expect that’s sufficient enough to make the larger systemic and cultural changes required.”
For these reasons, Jayadev criticized the memo, calling it “cosmetic,” rather than effective or substantive.
“This type of misconduct is not the exception, but rather an endemic to policing,” Jayadev said. “And it’s not because these employees were particularly stealthy, it’s because they know there was no legitimate accountability system or culture of accountability within the department.”
Liccardo also wants the city manager to report what citywide policies have been, or will be implemented to address the risk of exposing the public to harmful behavior pending investigations of city employees’ criminal conduct.
Under state law, city employees have rights to a full and fair investigation of any allegations of misconduct prior to termination or other disciplinary action.
“That doesn’t settle the question, however, of why these employees were not placed on leave or otherwise reassigned to mitigate the risk of harm to the public from their behavior,” Liccardo wrote in his memo.
For example, in 2021, Dominguez was accused of touching a 25-year-old woman’s breasts and thigh and kept trying to touch her even after she rejected his advances at a Memorial Day party at the home of another San Jose officer, according to the Mercury News. Her allegation was investigated, but no charges were ever filed.
San Jose’s IPA alerted SJPD’s Internal Affairs unit in June 2021, but Dominguez was still able to serve as an officer in the public until the recent April episode.
In Gerry’s case, it took four complaints and a civil lawsuit for the City Attorney’s Office investigation to lead to a witness whose statements triggered his arrest, according to Liccardo.
The city manager’s report will come to the full City Council on June 21. At that meeting, the council will also vote on whether or not to move forward with an IPA study.
Contact Jana Kadah at email@example.com or @Jana_Kadah on Twitter.
The post UPDATE: San Jose to study changes to worker misconduct investigations appeared first on thecupertinodigest.com.